<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-90036 — NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during blocked-lock reaping</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90036</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during blocked-lock reaping&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bare lock owner -- its only remaining reference a blocked lock on
nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lru -- holds a raw pointer to its nfs4_client but
no reference keeping the client alive. When the per-net laundromat
reaps such a lock, freeing the nbl drops the owner reference
held through flc_owner, and the final nfs4_put_stateowner()
takes the client&amp;#39;s cl_lock. Because the laundromat detaches the
nbl first, __destroy_client() no longer finds it, so a concurrent
force_expire_client() can free the client before nfs4_put_stateowner()
runs, dereferencing cl_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pin the client with cl_rpc_users before dropping
nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock, and skip clients already expiring, whose
blocked locks __destroy_client() frees while holding an owner
reference. Take nn-&amp;gt;client_lock outside nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock.
Every other site holds nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock as a leaf, acquiring
no further lock, so placing nn-&amp;gt;client_lock outside it cannot form
a lock-order cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during blocked-lock reaping&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bare lock owner -- its only remaining reference a blocked lock on
nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lru -- holds a raw pointer to its nfs4_client but
no reference keeping the client alive. When the per-net laundromat
reaps such a lock, freeing the nbl drops the owner reference
held through flc_owner, and the final nfs4_put_stateowner()
takes the client&amp;#39;s cl_lock. Because the laundromat detaches the
nbl first, __destroy_client() no longer finds it, so a concurrent
force_expire_client() can free the client before nfs4_put_stateowner()
runs, dereferencing cl_lock in freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pin the client with cl_rpc_users before dropping
nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock, and skip clients already expiring, whose
blocked locks __destroy_client() frees while holding an owner
reference. Take nn-&amp;gt;client_lock outside nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock.
Every other site holds nn-&amp;gt;blocked_locks_lock as a leaf, acquiring
no further lock, so placing nn-&amp;gt;client_lock outside it cannot form
a lock-order cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
