<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-89517 — sched_ext: Fix rq-&gt;core_pick corruption under core scheduling</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89517</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix rq-&amp;gt;core_pick corruption under core scheduling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Core scheduling&amp;#39;s pick_next_task() picks what to run on every SMT sibling of
the core in a single pass under the shared core-wide rq lock. The selection
state is consistent only while the lock is held continuously, so
-&amp;gt;pick_task() originally could not release it. However, since 4c95380701f5
(&amp;#34;sched/ext: Fold balance_scx() into pick_task_scx()&amp;#34;), sched_ext runs
dispatch from inside the pick and dispatching can drop the rq lock. To
support this, pick_next_task() has been updated to restart the whole
selection when a pick returns RETRY_TASK after releasing the lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When selections on the same core interleave through the dropped lock, they
corrupt each other&amp;#39;s state: one clears the other&amp;#39;s rq-&amp;gt;core_pick leading to
a NULL deref, or invalidates its keep-the-previous-task decision leaving a
dequeued task running, which deadlocks the next wakeup and matches the
reported hard hangs. A cookied ping-pong load on an SMT machine makes the
interleavings frequent and kills the kernel within seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by making the pick return RETRY_TASK whenever dispatch released the
rq lock, so that a selection only ever commits picks made under a
continuously held lock. The previous patch&amp;#39;s rq-&amp;gt;scx.lock_drop_seq counts
the releases. A dispatch that touched nothing never releases the lock and
its verdict, including &amp;#34;nothing to run&amp;#34;, stands: retries are bounded, each…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sched_ext: Fix rq-&amp;gt;core_pick corruption under core scheduling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Core scheduling&amp;#39;s pick_next_task() picks what to run on every SMT sibling of
the core in a single pass under the shared core-wide rq lock. The selection
state is consistent only while the lock is held continuously, so
-&amp;gt;pick_task() originally could not release it. However, since 4c95380701f5
(&amp;#34;sched/ext: Fold balance_scx() into pick_task_scx()&amp;#34;), sched_ext runs
dispatch from inside the pick and dispatching can drop the rq lock. To
support this, pick_next_task() has been updated to restart the whole
selection when a pick returns RETRY_TASK after releasing the lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When selections on the same core interleave through the dropped lock, they
corrupt each other&amp;#39;s state: one clears the other&amp;#39;s rq-&amp;gt;core_pick leading to
a NULL deref, or invalidates its keep-the-previous-task decision leaving a
dequeued task running, which deadlocks the next wakeup and matches the
reported hard hangs. A cookied ping-pong load on an SMT machine makes the
interleavings frequent and kills the kernel within seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by making the pick return RETRY_TASK whenever dispatch released the
rq lock, so that a selection only ever commits picks made under a
continuously held lock. The previous patch&amp;#39;s rq-&amp;gt;scx.lock_drop_seq counts
the releases. A dispatch that touched nothing never releases the lock and
its verdict, including &amp;#34;nothing to run&amp;#34;, stands: retries are bounded, each…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
