<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-80610 — net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80610</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so
pf-&amp;gt;caps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in
enetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and
VFs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Division by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV
instructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so
the issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this
behavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF&amp;#39;s
rings have been configured.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so
pf-&amp;gt;caps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in
enetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and
VFs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Division by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV
instructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so
the issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this
behavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF&amp;#39;s
rings have been configured.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
