<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-80527 — ceph: fix hanging __ceph_get_caps() with stale mds_wanted</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ceph: fix hanging __ceph_get_caps() with stale mds_wanted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A reader can hang forever in __ceph_get_caps() when the client no
longer holds `FILE_RD`, but local cap state still says that the
capability is already wanted (via `mds_wanted`).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way to trigger this is through MDS cap revocation.  If another
client performs a conflicting operation, the MDS can revoke `FILE_RD`
from the reader; the next read then has to reacquire `FILE_RD`.  If
the cap update that should request `FILE_RD` never reaches the MDS
after `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted` was raised, the reader is left holding only
non-file caps while local `mds_wanted` still includes the file read
caps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that state, try_get_cap_refs() sees `need &amp;lt;= mds_wanted` and
returns 0, so __ceph_get_caps() just waits on `i_cap_wq`.  If the cap
update that was supposed to request `FILE_RD never reaches the MDS
after `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted was` raised, no further request is sent and the
waiter can sleep indefinitely until unrelated cap traffic happens to
wake it up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ordering issue is that `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted` is updated in
__prep_cap() before the `CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_CAPS message` is actually
queued for send.  That makes one field serve two different meanings at
once: what this client wants, and what the client believes the MDS
already knows it wants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A proper fix would be to split those states and track whether a cap
update is actually in flight or has been observed by the MDS.
How…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ceph: fix hanging __ceph_get_caps() with stale mds_wanted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A reader can hang forever in __ceph_get_caps() when the client no
longer holds `FILE_RD`, but local cap state still says that the
capability is already wanted (via `mds_wanted`).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way to trigger this is through MDS cap revocation.  If another
client performs a conflicting operation, the MDS can revoke `FILE_RD`
from the reader; the next read then has to reacquire `FILE_RD`.  If
the cap update that should request `FILE_RD` never reaches the MDS
after `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted` was raised, the reader is left holding only
non-file caps while local `mds_wanted` still includes the file read
caps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that state, try_get_cap_refs() sees `need &amp;lt;= mds_wanted` and
returns 0, so __ceph_get_caps() just waits on `i_cap_wq`.  If the cap
update that was supposed to request `FILE_RD never reaches the MDS
after `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted was` raised, no further request is sent and the
waiter can sleep indefinitely until unrelated cap traffic happens to
wake it up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ordering issue is that `cap-&amp;gt;mds_wanted` is updated in
__prep_cap() before the `CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_CAPS message` is actually
queued for send.  That makes one field serve two different meanings at
once: what this client wants, and what the client believes the MDS
already knows it wants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A proper fix would be to split those states and track whether a cap
update is actually in flight or has been observed by the MDS.
How…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
