<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-74582 — packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring send paths</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-74582</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring send paths&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet_snd() reads dev-&amp;gt;hard_header_len multiple times while allocating
and constructing an skb. Device reconfiguration can change this value
concurrently, for example through bonding device type changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For SOCK_RAW, packet_snd() can save a larger value in reserve and later
allocate headroom using a smaller value. Moving skb-&amp;gt;data back by reserve
then places it before skb-&amp;gt;head, and the following copy from userspace can
attempt an out-of-bounds write.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet_sendmsg_spkt() has the same issue because it calculates its
reservation and header offset from separate reads before dropping the RCU
read lock to allocate the skb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX() for callers that already saved a header length.
Read hard_header_len once in packet_snd() and use it for allocation and
construction. In packet_sendmsg_spkt(), preserve the allocation-time value
through the device lookup retry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and
header_ops-&amp;gt;create is not addressed here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring send paths&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet_snd() reads dev-&amp;gt;hard_header_len multiple times while allocating
and constructing an skb. Device reconfiguration can change this value
concurrently, for example through bonding device type changes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For SOCK_RAW, packet_snd() can save a larger value in reserve and later
allocate headroom using a smaller value. Moving skb-&amp;gt;data back by reserve
then places it before skb-&amp;gt;head, and the following copy from userspace can
attempt an out-of-bounds write.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;packet_sendmsg_spkt() has the same issue because it calculates its
reservation and header offset from separate reads before dropping the RCU
read lock to allocate the skb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX() for callers that already saved a header length.
Read hard_header_len once in packet_snd() and use it for allocation and
construction. In packet_sendmsg_spkt(), preserve the allocation-time value
through the device lookup retry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and
header_ops-&amp;gt;create is not addressed here.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-74582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
