<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-74506 — afs: Fix UAF when sending a message</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-74506</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-74506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
