<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-72380 — xen/pvcalls: bound backend response req_id before indexing rsp[]</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72380</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xen/pvcalls: bound backend response req_id before indexing rsp[]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pvcalls_front_event_handler() takes req_id directly from the
backend-supplied ring response and uses it to index the fixed-size
bedata-&amp;gt;rsp[] array for a memcpy() and a store, with no range check. A
malicious or buggy backend can set req_id past PVCALLS_NR_RSP_PER_RING
and drive an out-of-bounds write past the bedata allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;req_id was also declared int while the wire field rsp-&amp;gt;req_id is u32, so
a range check on the signed value alone is insufficient: a backend
req_id of 0xffffffff becomes -1, passes a &amp;gt;= PVCALLS_NR_RSP_PER_RING
test and indexes bedata-&amp;gt;rsp[-1]. Declare req_id as u32 so a single
bound covers both ends.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A backend that sends an out-of-range req_id has violated the wire
protocol, so rather than silently dropping the response, log once and
stop trusting the backend: set bedata-&amp;gt;disabled. The event handler then
ignores further responses, and the request paths that wait for a
response return -EIO instead of blocking forever. This mirrors the
fatal-error handling xen-netback uses (xenvif_fatal_tx_err()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pvcalls frontend currently trusts its backend, so this is not a
classic-Xen security issue, but it matters for hardening PV frontends
against malicious backends (confidential and disaggregated deployments).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xen/pvcalls: bound backend response req_id before indexing rsp[]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pvcalls_front_event_handler() takes req_id directly from the
backend-supplied ring response and uses it to index the fixed-size
bedata-&amp;gt;rsp[] array for a memcpy() and a store, with no range check. A
malicious or buggy backend can set req_id past PVCALLS_NR_RSP_PER_RING
and drive an out-of-bounds write past the bedata allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;req_id was also declared int while the wire field rsp-&amp;gt;req_id is u32, so
a range check on the signed value alone is insufficient: a backend
req_id of 0xffffffff becomes -1, passes a &amp;gt;= PVCALLS_NR_RSP_PER_RING
test and indexes bedata-&amp;gt;rsp[-1]. Declare req_id as u32 so a single
bound covers both ends.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A backend that sends an out-of-range req_id has violated the wire
protocol, so rather than silently dropping the response, log once and
stop trusting the backend: set bedata-&amp;gt;disabled. The event handler then
ignores further responses, and the request paths that wait for a
response return -EIO instead of blocking forever. This mirrors the
fatal-error handling xen-netback uses (xenvif_fatal_tx_err()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pvcalls frontend currently trusts its backend, so this is not a
classic-Xen security issue, but it matters for hardening PV frontends
against malicious backends (confidential and disaggregated deployments).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
