<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-72379 — fs: refuse O_TMPFILE creation with an unmapped fsuid or fsgid</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: refuse O_TMPFILE creation with an unmapped fsuid or fsgid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vfs_tmpfile() never checked that the caller&amp;#39;s fsuid and fsgid map into
the filesystem.  On an idmapped mount whose idmapping does not cover the
caller&amp;#39;s fs{u,g}id, the -&amp;gt;tmpfile() instance initializes the new inode
through inode_init_owner(), where mapped_fsuid()/mapped_fsgid() return
INVALID_UID/INVALID_GID, and the tmpfile ends up owned by (uid_t)-1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every other creation path already refuses this: may_o_create() (O_CREAT)
and may_create_dentry() (mkdir, mknod, symlink, link) bail out with
-EOVERFLOW via fsuidgid_has_mapping() precisely so that an object cannot
be created with an owner the filesystem cannot represent.  An O_TMPFILE
is no exception: it is created I_LINKABLE and linkat(2) can splice it
into the namespace afterwards, so the same guarantee must hold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing fsuidgid_has_mapping() check to vfs_tmpfile().  On a
non-idmapped mount the caller&amp;#39;s fs{u,g}id always map in the superblock&amp;#39;s
user namespace, so this is a no-op there and only takes effect on an
idmapped mount that does not map the caller.  It applies to every
filesystem that sets FS_ALLOW_IDMAP and implements -&amp;gt;tmpfile() (tmpfs,
ext4, btrfs, xfs, f2fs, ...), and to overlayfs, whose upper-layer
tmpfile creation funnels through vfs_tmpfile() via backing_tmpfile_open().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: refuse O_TMPFILE creation with an unmapped fsuid or fsgid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vfs_tmpfile() never checked that the caller&amp;#39;s fsuid and fsgid map into
the filesystem.  On an idmapped mount whose idmapping does not cover the
caller&amp;#39;s fs{u,g}id, the -&amp;gt;tmpfile() instance initializes the new inode
through inode_init_owner(), where mapped_fsuid()/mapped_fsgid() return
INVALID_UID/INVALID_GID, and the tmpfile ends up owned by (uid_t)-1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every other creation path already refuses this: may_o_create() (O_CREAT)
and may_create_dentry() (mkdir, mknod, symlink, link) bail out with
-EOVERFLOW via fsuidgid_has_mapping() precisely so that an object cannot
be created with an owner the filesystem cannot represent.  An O_TMPFILE
is no exception: it is created I_LINKABLE and linkat(2) can splice it
into the namespace afterwards, so the same guarantee must hold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing fsuidgid_has_mapping() check to vfs_tmpfile().  On a
non-idmapped mount the caller&amp;#39;s fs{u,g}id always map in the superblock&amp;#39;s
user namespace, so this is a no-op there and only takes effect on an
idmapped mount that does not map the caller.  It applies to every
filesystem that sets FS_ALLOW_IDMAP and implements -&amp;gt;tmpfile() (tmpfs,
ext4, btrfs, xfs, f2fs, ...), and to overlayfs, whose upper-layer
tmpfile creation funnels through vfs_tmpfile() via backing_tmpfile_open().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
