<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 03:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-68118 — tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-68118</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-68118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
