<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53267 — netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53267</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;table ip t {
        chain pre {
            type filter hook prerouting priority raw;
            ct zone set 1
            ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept
        }
    }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via
nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -&amp;gt; kzalloc, tuple is all
zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls
nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct
and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this
overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller
dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(),
mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally,
bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv-&amp;gt;len
instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple
before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading
bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple-&amp;gt;{src,dst}.u3.all are
well-defined zero. priv-&amp;gt;len is validated at rule load, so the
copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than
by an untrusted field on the conntrack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;table ip t {
        chain pre {
            type filter hook prerouting priority raw;
            ct zone set 1
            ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept
        }
    }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via
nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -&amp;gt; kzalloc, tuple is all
zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls
nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct
and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this
overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller
dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(),
mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally,
bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv-&amp;gt;len
instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple
before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading
bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple-&amp;gt;{src,dst}.u3.all are
well-defined zero. priv-&amp;gt;len is validated at rule load, so the
copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than
by an untrusted field on the conntrack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
