<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53116 — s390/ap: use generic driver_override infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53116</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;s390/ap: use generic driver_override infrastructure&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the AP masks are updated via apmask_store() or aqmask_store(),
ap_bus_revise_bindings() is called after ap_attr_mutex has been
released.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This calls __ap_revise_reserved(), which accesses the driver_override
field without holding any lock, racing against a concurrent
driver_override_store() that may free the old string, resulting in a
potential UAF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using the driver-core driver_override infrastructure, which
protects all accesses with an internal spinlock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that unlike most other buses, the AP bus does not check
driver_override in its match() callback; the override is checked in
ap_device_probe() and __ap_revise_reserved() instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also note that we do not enable the driver_override feature of struct
bus_type, as AP - in contrast to most other buses - passes &amp;#34;&amp;#34; to
sysfs_emit() when the driver_override pointer is NULL. Thus, printing
&amp;#34;\n&amp;#34; instead of &amp;#34;(null)\n&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, AP has a custom counter that is modified in the
corresponding custom driver_override_store().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;s390/ap: use generic driver_override infrastructure&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the AP masks are updated via apmask_store() or aqmask_store(),
ap_bus_revise_bindings() is called after ap_attr_mutex has been
released.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This calls __ap_revise_reserved(), which accesses the driver_override
field without holding any lock, racing against a concurrent
driver_override_store() that may free the old string, resulting in a
potential UAF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using the driver-core driver_override infrastructure, which
protects all accesses with an internal spinlock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that unlike most other buses, the AP bus does not check
driver_override in its match() callback; the override is checked in
ap_device_probe() and __ap_revise_reserved() instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also note that we do not enable the driver_override feature of struct
bus_type, as AP - in contrast to most other buses - passes &amp;#34;&amp;#34; to
sysfs_emit() when the driver_override pointer is NULL. Thus, printing
&amp;#34;\n&amp;#34; instead of &amp;#34;(null)\n&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, AP has a custom counter that is modified in the
corresponding custom driver_override_store().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
