<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53050 — quota: Fix race of dquot_scan_active() with quota deactivation</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53050</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;quota: Fix race of dquot_scan_active() with quota deactivation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dquot_scan_active() can race with quota deactivation in
quota_release_workfn() like:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 (quota_release_workfn)         CPU1 (dquot_scan_active)
  ==============================      ==============================
  spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  list_replace_init(
    &amp;amp;releasing_dquots, &amp;amp;rls_head);
    /* dquot X on rls_head,
       dq_count == 0,
       DQ_ACTIVE_B still set */
  spin_unlock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  synchronize_srcu(&amp;amp;dquot_srcu);
                                      spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
                                      list_for_each_entry(dquot,
                                          &amp;amp;inuse_list, dq_inuse) {
                                        /* finds dquot X */
                                        dquot_active(X) -&amp;gt; true
                                        atomic_inc(&amp;amp;X-&amp;gt;dq_count);
                                      }
                                      spin_unlock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  dquot = list_first_entry(&amp;amp;rls_head);
  WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&amp;amp;dquot-&amp;gt;dq_count));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is not only a cosmetic one as under memory pressure the
caller of dquot_scan_active() can end up working on freed dquot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the problem by making sure the dquot is removed from releasing list
when we acquire a reference to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;quota: Fix race of dquot_scan_active() with quota deactivation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dquot_scan_active() can race with quota deactivation in
quota_release_workfn() like:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0 (quota_release_workfn)         CPU1 (dquot_scan_active)
  ==============================      ==============================
  spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  list_replace_init(
    &amp;amp;releasing_dquots, &amp;amp;rls_head);
    /* dquot X on rls_head,
       dq_count == 0,
       DQ_ACTIVE_B still set */
  spin_unlock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  synchronize_srcu(&amp;amp;dquot_srcu);
                                      spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
                                      list_for_each_entry(dquot,
                                          &amp;amp;inuse_list, dq_inuse) {
                                        /* finds dquot X */
                                        dquot_active(X) -&amp;gt; true
                                        atomic_inc(&amp;amp;X-&amp;gt;dq_count);
                                      }
                                      spin_unlock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  spin_lock(&amp;amp;dq_list_lock);
  dquot = list_first_entry(&amp;amp;rls_head);
  WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&amp;amp;dquot-&amp;gt;dq_count));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is not only a cosmetic one as under memory pressure the
caller of dquot_scan_active() can end up working on freed dquot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the problem by making sure the dquot is removed from releasing list
when we acquire a reference to it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
