<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-45914 — Revert "hwmon: (ibmpex) fix use-after-free in high/low store"</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45914</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;hwmon: (ibmpex) fix use-after-free in high/low store&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit 6946c726c3f4c36f0f049e6f97e88c510b15f65d.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jean Delvare points out that the patch does not completely
fix the reported problem, that it in fact introduces a
(new) race condition, and that it may actually not be needed in
the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Various AI reviews agree. Specific and relevant AI feedback:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;
This reordering sets the driver data to NULL before removing the sensor
attributes in the loop below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ibmpex_show_sensor() retrieves this driver data via dev_get_drvdata() but
does not check if it is NULL before dereferencing it to access
data-&amp;gt;sensors[].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a userspace process reads a sensor file (like temp1_input) while this
delete function is running, could it race with the dev_set_drvdata(...,
NULL) call here and crash in ibmpex_show_sensor()?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would it be safer to keep the original order where device_remove_file() is
called before clearing the driver data? device_remove_file() should wait
for any active sysfs callbacks to complete, which might already prevent the
use-after-free this patch intends to fix.
&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert the offending patch. If it can be shown that the originally reported
alleged race condition does indeed exist, it can always be re-introduced
with a complete fix.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert &amp;#34;hwmon: (ibmpex) fix use-after-free in high/low store&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reverts commit 6946c726c3f4c36f0f049e6f97e88c510b15f65d.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jean Delvare points out that the patch does not completely
fix the reported problem, that it in fact introduces a
(new) race condition, and that it may actually not be needed in
the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Various AI reviews agree. Specific and relevant AI feedback:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;
This reordering sets the driver data to NULL before removing the sensor
attributes in the loop below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ibmpex_show_sensor() retrieves this driver data via dev_get_drvdata() but
does not check if it is NULL before dereferencing it to access
data-&amp;gt;sensors[].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a userspace process reads a sensor file (like temp1_input) while this
delete function is running, could it race with the dev_set_drvdata(...,
NULL) call here and crash in ibmpex_show_sensor()?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would it be safer to keep the original order where device_remove_file() is
called before clearing the driver data? device_remove_file() should wait
for any active sysfs callbacks to complete, which might already prevent the
use-after-free this patch intends to fix.
&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert the offending patch. If it can be shown that the originally reported
alleged race condition does indeed exist, it can always be re-introduced
with a complete fix.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
