<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 19:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-43304 — libceph: define and enforce CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43304</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;libceph: define and enforce CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When decoding the key, verify that the key material would fit into
a fixed-size buffer in process_auth_done() and generally has a sane
length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN check replaces the existing check for a key
with no key material which is a) not universal since CEPH_CRYPTO_NONE
has to be excluded and b) doesn&amp;#39;t provide much value since a smaller
than needed key is just as invalid as no key -- this has to be handled
elsewhere anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;libceph: define and enforce CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When decoding the key, verify that the key material would fit into
a fixed-size buffer in process_auth_done() and generally has a sane
length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN check replaces the existing check for a key
with no key material which is a) not universal since CEPH_CRYPTO_NONE
has to be excluded and b) doesn&amp;#39;t provide much value since a smaller
than needed key is just as invalid as no key -- this has to be handled
elsewhere anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
