<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 00:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-31531 — ipv4: nexthop: allocate skb dynamically in rtm_get_nexthop()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-31531</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: nexthop: allocate skb dynamically in rtm_get_nexthop()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When querying a nexthop object via RTM_GETNEXTHOP, the kernel currently
allocates a fixed-size skb using NLMSG_GOODSIZE. While sufficient for
single nexthops and small Equal-Cost Multi-Path groups, this fixed
allocation fails for large nexthop groups like 512 nexthops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in the following warning splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: net/ipv4/nexthop.c:3395 at rtm_get_nexthop+0x176/0x1c0, CPU#20: rep/4608
 [...]
 RIP: 0010:rtm_get_nexthop (net/ipv4/nexthop.c:3395)
 [...]
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6989)
  netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550)
  netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344)
  netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894)
  ____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:721 net/socket.c:736 net/socket.c:2585)
  ___sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2641)
  __sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2671)
  do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
  &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by allocating the size dynamically using nh_nlmsg_size() and
using nlmsg_new(), this is consistent with nexthop_notify() behavior. In
addition, adjust nh_nlmsg_size_grp() so it calculates the size needed
based on flags passed. While at it, also add the size of NHA_FDB for
nexthop group size calculation as it was missing too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This cannot b…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: nexthop: allocate skb dynamically in rtm_get_nexthop()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When querying a nexthop object via RTM_GETNEXTHOP, the kernel currently
allocates a fixed-size skb using NLMSG_GOODSIZE. While sufficient for
single nexthops and small Equal-Cost Multi-Path groups, this fixed
allocation fails for large nexthop groups like 512 nexthops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in the following warning splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: net/ipv4/nexthop.c:3395 at rtm_get_nexthop+0x176/0x1c0, CPU#20: rep/4608
 [...]
 RIP: 0010:rtm_get_nexthop (net/ipv4/nexthop.c:3395)
 [...]
 Call Trace:
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6989)
  netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550)
  netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344)
  netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894)
  ____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:721 net/socket.c:736 net/socket.c:2585)
  ___sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2641)
  __sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2671)
  do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
  &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by allocating the size dynamically using nh_nlmsg_size() and
using nlmsg_new(), this is consistent with nexthop_notify() behavior. In
addition, adjust nh_nlmsg_size_grp() so it calculates the size needed
based on flags passed. While at it, also add the size of NHA_FDB for
nexthop group size calculation as it was missing too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This cannot b…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-31531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
