<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23460 — net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23460</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
