<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:50:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23199 — procfs: avoid fetching build ID while holding VMA lock</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23199</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;procfs: avoid fetching build ID while holding VMA lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix PROCMAP_QUERY to fetch optional build ID only after dropping mmap_lock
or per-VMA lock, whichever was used to lock VMA under question, to avoid
deadlock reported by syzbot:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;gt; #1 (&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
        __might_fault+0xed/0x170
        _copy_to_iter+0x118/0x1720
        copy_page_to_iter+0x12d/0x1e0
        filemap_read+0x720/0x10a0
        blkdev_read_iter+0x2b5/0x4e0
        vfs_read+0x7f4/0xae0
        ksys_read+0x12a/0x250
        do_syscall_64+0xcb/0xf80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;gt; #0 (&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{4:4}:
        __lock_acquire+0x1509/0x26d0
        lock_acquire+0x185/0x340
        down_read+0x98/0x490
        blkdev_read_iter+0x2a7/0x4e0
        __kernel_read+0x39a/0xa90
        freader_fetch+0x1d5/0xa80
        __build_id_parse.isra.0+0xea/0x6a0
        do_procmap_query+0xd75/0x1050
        procfs_procmap_ioctl+0x7a/0xb0
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18e/0x210
        do_syscall_64+0xcb/0xf80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   rlock(&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock);
                                lock(&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8);
                                lock(&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock);
   rlock(&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DE…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;procfs: avoid fetching build ID while holding VMA lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix PROCMAP_QUERY to fetch optional build ID only after dropping mmap_lock
or per-VMA lock, whichever was used to lock VMA under question, to avoid
deadlock reported by syzbot:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;gt; #1 (&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
        __might_fault+0xed/0x170
        _copy_to_iter+0x118/0x1720
        copy_page_to_iter+0x12d/0x1e0
        filemap_read+0x720/0x10a0
        blkdev_read_iter+0x2b5/0x4e0
        vfs_read+0x7f4/0xae0
        ksys_read+0x12a/0x250
        do_syscall_64+0xcb/0xf80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;gt; #0 (&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{4:4}:
        __lock_acquire+0x1509/0x26d0
        lock_acquire+0x185/0x340
        down_read+0x98/0x490
        blkdev_read_iter+0x2a7/0x4e0
        __kernel_read+0x39a/0xa90
        freader_fetch+0x1d5/0xa80
        __build_id_parse.isra.0+0xea/0x6a0
        do_procmap_query+0xd75/0x1050
        procfs_procmap_ioctl+0x7a/0xb0
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18e/0x210
        do_syscall_64+0xcb/0xf80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   rlock(&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock);
                                lock(&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8);
                                lock(&amp;amp;mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock);
   rlock(&amp;amp;sb-&amp;gt;s_type-&amp;gt;i_mutex_key#8);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DE…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
