<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 18:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-71237 — nilfs2: Fix potential block overflow that cause system hang</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-71237</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nilfs2: Fix potential block overflow that cause system hang&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a user executes the FITRIM command, an underflow can occur when
calculating nblocks if end_block is too small. Since nblocks is of
type sector_t, which is u64, a negative nblocks value will become a
very large positive integer. This ultimately leads to the block layer
function __blkdev_issue_discard() taking an excessively long time to
process the bio chain, and the ns_segctor_sem lock remains held for a
long period. This prevents other tasks from acquiring the ns_segctor_sem
lock, resulting in the hang reported by syzbot in [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the ending block is too small, typically if it is smaller than 4KiB
range, depending on the usage of the segment 0, it may be possible to
attempt a discard request beyond the device size causing the hang.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exiting successfully and assign the discarded size (0 in this case)
to range-&amp;gt;len.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the start and len values in the user input range are too small,
a conservative strategy is adopted here to safely ignore them, which is
equivalent to a no-op; it will not perform any trimming and will not
throw an error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]
task:segctord state:D stack:28968 pid:6093 tgid:6093  ppid:2 task_flags:0x200040 flags:0x00080000
Call Trace:
 rwbase_write_lock+0x3dd/0x750 kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c:272
 nilfs_transaction_lock+0x253/0x4c0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357
 nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2569 [inline]…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nilfs2: Fix potential block overflow that cause system hang&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a user executes the FITRIM command, an underflow can occur when
calculating nblocks if end_block is too small. Since nblocks is of
type sector_t, which is u64, a negative nblocks value will become a
very large positive integer. This ultimately leads to the block layer
function __blkdev_issue_discard() taking an excessively long time to
process the bio chain, and the ns_segctor_sem lock remains held for a
long period. This prevents other tasks from acquiring the ns_segctor_sem
lock, resulting in the hang reported by syzbot in [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the ending block is too small, typically if it is smaller than 4KiB
range, depending on the usage of the segment 0, it may be possible to
attempt a discard request beyond the device size causing the hang.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exiting successfully and assign the discarded size (0 in this case)
to range-&amp;gt;len.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the start and len values in the user input range are too small,
a conservative strategy is adopted here to safely ignore them, which is
equivalent to a no-op; it will not perform any trimming and will not
throw an error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]
task:segctord state:D stack:28968 pid:6093 tgid:6093  ppid:2 task_flags:0x200040 flags:0x00080000
Call Trace:
 rwbase_write_lock+0x3dd/0x750 kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c:272
 nilfs_transaction_lock+0x253/0x4c0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357
 nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2569 [inline]…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-71237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
