<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-37999 — fs/erofs/fileio: call erofs_onlinefolio_split() after bio_add_folio()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37999</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs/erofs/fileio: call erofs_onlinefolio_split() after bio_add_folio()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If bio_add_folio() fails (because it is full),
erofs_fileio_scan_folio() needs to submit the I/O request via
erofs_fileio_rq_submit() and allocate a new I/O request with an empty
`struct bio`.  Then it retries the bio_add_folio() call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, at this point, erofs_onlinefolio_split() has already been
called which increments `folio-&amp;gt;private`; the retry will call
erofs_onlinefolio_split() again, but there will never be a matching
erofs_onlinefolio_end() call.  This leaves the folio locked forever
and all waiters will be stuck in folio_wait_bit_common().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug has been added by commit ce63cb62d794 (&amp;#34;erofs: support
unencoded inodes for fileio&amp;#34;), but was practically unreachable because
there was room for 256 folios in the `struct bio` - until commit
9f74ae8c9ac9 (&amp;#34;erofs: shorten bvecs[] for file-backed mounts&amp;#34;) which
reduced the array capacity to 16 folios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was now trivial to trigger the bug by manually invoking readahead
from userspace, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_fadvise(fd, 0, st.st_size, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should be fixed by invoking erofs_onlinefolio_split() only after
bio_add_folio() has succeeded.  This is safe: asynchronous completions
invoking erofs_onlinefolio_end() will not unlock the folio because
erofs_fileio_scan_folio() is still holding a reference to be released
by erofs_onlinefolio_end() at the end.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs/erofs/fileio: call erofs_onlinefolio_split() after bio_add_folio()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If bio_add_folio() fails (because it is full),
erofs_fileio_scan_folio() needs to submit the I/O request via
erofs_fileio_rq_submit() and allocate a new I/O request with an empty
`struct bio`.  Then it retries the bio_add_folio() call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, at this point, erofs_onlinefolio_split() has already been
called which increments `folio-&amp;gt;private`; the retry will call
erofs_onlinefolio_split() again, but there will never be a matching
erofs_onlinefolio_end() call.  This leaves the folio locked forever
and all waiters will be stuck in folio_wait_bit_common().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug has been added by commit ce63cb62d794 (&amp;#34;erofs: support
unencoded inodes for fileio&amp;#34;), but was practically unreachable because
there was room for 256 folios in the `struct bio` - until commit
9f74ae8c9ac9 (&amp;#34;erofs: shorten bvecs[] for file-backed mounts&amp;#34;) which
reduced the array capacity to 16 folios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was now trivial to trigger the bug by manually invoking readahead
from userspace, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posix_fadvise(fd, 0, st.st_size, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should be fixed by invoking erofs_onlinefolio_split() only after
bio_add_folio() has succeeded.  This is safe: asynchronous completions
invoking erofs_onlinefolio_end() will not unlock the folio because
erofs_fileio_scan_folio() is still holding a reference to be released
by erofs_onlinefolio_end() at the end.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-37999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
