<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-47744 — KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-47744</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there&amp;#39;s a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&amp;amp;vcpu-&amp;gt;mutex);
3                                                     lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;srcu);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpuhp_cpufreq_online()
  |
  -&amp;gt; cpufreq_online()
     |
     -&amp;gt; cpufreq_gov_performance_limits()
        |
        -&amp;gt; __cpufreq_driver_target()
           |
           -&amp;gt; __target_index()
              |
              -&amp;gt; cpufreq_freq_transition_begin()
                 |
                 -&amp;gt; cpufreq_notify_transition()
                    |
                    -&amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there&amp;#39;s a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&amp;amp;vcpu-&amp;gt;mutex);
3                                                     lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&amp;amp;kvm-&amp;gt;srcu);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cpuhp_cpufreq_online()
  |
  -&amp;gt; cpufreq_online()
     |
     -&amp;gt; cpufreq_gov_performance_limits()
        |
        -&amp;gt; __cpufreq_driver_target()
           |
           -&amp;gt; __target_index()
              |
              -&amp;gt; cpufreq_freq_transition_begin()
                 |
                 -&amp;gt; cpufreq_notify_transition()
                    |
                    -&amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-47744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
