<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-43887 — net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-43887</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lifetime of TCP-AO static_key is the same as the last
tcp_ao_info. On the socket destruction tcp_ao_info ceases to be
with RCU grace period, while tcp-ao static branch is currently deferred
destructed. The static key definition is
: DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(tcp_ao_needed, HZ);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which means that if RCU grace period is delayed by more than a second
and tcp_ao_needed is in the process of disablement, other CPUs may
yet see tcp_ao_info which atent dead, but soon-to-be.
And that breaks the assumption of static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See the comment near the definition:
&amp;gt; * The caller must make sure that the static key can&amp;#39;t get disabled while
&amp;gt; * in this function. It doesn&amp;#39;t patch jump labels, only adds a user to
&amp;gt; * an already enabled static key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally it was introduced in commit eb8c507296f6 (&amp;#34;jump_label:
Prevent key-&amp;gt;enabled int overflow&amp;#34;), which is needed for the atomic
contexts, one of which would be the creation of a full socket from a
request socket. In that atomic context, it&amp;#39;s known by the presence
of the key (md5/ao) that the static branch is already enabled.
So, the ref counter for that static branch is just incremented
instead of holding the proper mutex.
static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled() is just a helper for such usage
case. But it must not be used if the static branch could get disabled
in parallel as it&amp;#39;s not prot…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lifetime of TCP-AO static_key is the same as the last
tcp_ao_info. On the socket destruction tcp_ao_info ceases to be
with RCU grace period, while tcp-ao static branch is currently deferred
destructed. The static key definition is
: DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(tcp_ao_needed, HZ);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which means that if RCU grace period is delayed by more than a second
and tcp_ao_needed is in the process of disablement, other CPUs may
yet see tcp_ao_info which atent dead, but soon-to-be.
And that breaks the assumption of static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See the comment near the definition:
&amp;gt; * The caller must make sure that the static key can&amp;#39;t get disabled while
&amp;gt; * in this function. It doesn&amp;#39;t patch jump labels, only adds a user to
&amp;gt; * an already enabled static key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally it was introduced in commit eb8c507296f6 (&amp;#34;jump_label:
Prevent key-&amp;gt;enabled int overflow&amp;#34;), which is needed for the atomic
contexts, one of which would be the creation of a full socket from a
request socket. In that atomic context, it&amp;#39;s known by the presence
of the key (md5/ao) that the static branch is already enabled.
So, the ref counter for that static branch is just incremented
instead of holding the proper mutex.
static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled() is just a helper for such usage
case. But it must not be used if the static branch could get disabled
in parallel as it&amp;#39;s not prot…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-43887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
