<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-54232 — m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-54232</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__get_kernel_nofault() does copy data in supervisor mode when
forcing a task backtrace log through /proc/sysrq_trigger.
This is expected cause a bus error exception on e.g. NULL
pointer dereferencing when logging a kernel task has no
workqueue associated. This bus error ought to be ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our 030 bus error handler is ill equipped to deal with this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whenever ssw indicates a kernel mode access on a data fault,
we don&amp;#39;t even attempt to handle the fault and instead always
send a SEGV signal (or panic). As a result, the check
for exception handling at the fault PC (buried in
send_sig_fault() which gets called from do_page_fault()
eventually) is never used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, both 040 and 060 access error handlers do not
care whether a fault happened on supervisor mode access,
and will call do_page_fault() on those, ultimately honoring
the exception table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a check in bus_error030 to call do_page_fault() in case
we do have an entry for the fault PC in our exception table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had attempted a fix for this earlier in 2019 that did rely
on testing pagefault_disabled() (see link below) to achieve
the same thing, but this patch should be more generic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested on 030 Atari Falcon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__get_kernel_nofault() does copy data in supervisor mode when
forcing a task backtrace log through /proc/sysrq_trigger.
This is expected cause a bus error exception on e.g. NULL
pointer dereferencing when logging a kernel task has no
workqueue associated. This bus error ought to be ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our 030 bus error handler is ill equipped to deal with this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whenever ssw indicates a kernel mode access on a data fault,
we don&amp;#39;t even attempt to handle the fault and instead always
send a SEGV signal (or panic). As a result, the check
for exception handling at the fault PC (buried in
send_sig_fault() which gets called from do_page_fault()
eventually) is never used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In contrast, both 040 and 060 access error handlers do not
care whether a fault happened on supervisor mode access,
and will call do_page_fault() on those, ultimately honoring
the exception table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a check in bus_error030 to call do_page_fault() in case
we do have an entry for the fault PC in our exception table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had attempted a fix for this earlier in 2019 that did rely
on testing pagefault_disabled() (see link below) to achieve
the same thing, but this patch should be more generic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested on 030 Atari Falcon.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-54232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
