<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53760 — scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;hwq-&gt;cq_lock deadlock issue</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53760</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock deadlock issue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -&amp;gt; {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffffff8028444600 (&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
  _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
  ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
  ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
  gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
  do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
  el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(&amp;amp;hwq-&amp;gt;cq_lock);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[name:lockdep&amp;amp;]
 stack backtrace:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
