<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53618 — btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53618</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it&amp;#39;s a reloc tree for quota tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won&amp;#39;t be shared with other trees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it&amp;#39;s a reloc tree for quota tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won&amp;#39;t be shared with other trees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
