<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53557 — fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While running bpf selftests it&amp;#39;s possible to get following fault:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
   &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In unregister_fprobe function we can&amp;#39;t release fp-&amp;gt;rethook while it&amp;#39;s
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moving rethook_free call after fp-&amp;gt;ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
