<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53524 — wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: Fix integer overflow in iwl_write_to_user_buf</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53524</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: Fix integer overflow in iwl_write_to_user_buf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An integer overflow occurs in the iwl_write_to_user_buf() function,
which is called by the iwl_dbgfs_monitor_data_read() function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;static bool iwl_write_to_user_buf(char __user *user_buf, ssize_t count,
				  void *buf, ssize_t *size,
				  ssize_t *bytes_copied)
{
	int buf_size_left = count - *bytes_copied;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;buf_size_left = buf_size_left - (buf_size_left % sizeof(u32));
	if (*size &amp;gt; buf_size_left)
		*size = buf_size_left;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the user passes a SIZE_MAX value to the &amp;#34;ssize_t count&amp;#34; parameter,
the ssize_t count parameter is assigned to &amp;#34;int buf_size_left&amp;#34;.
Then compare &amp;#34;*size&amp;#34; with &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; . Here, &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; is a
negative number, so &amp;#34;*size&amp;#34; is assigned &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; and goes into
the third argument of the copy_to_user function, causing a heap overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a security vulnerability because iwl_dbgfs_monitor_data_read()
is a debugfs operation with 0400 privileges.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: Fix integer overflow in iwl_write_to_user_buf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An integer overflow occurs in the iwl_write_to_user_buf() function,
which is called by the iwl_dbgfs_monitor_data_read() function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;static bool iwl_write_to_user_buf(char __user *user_buf, ssize_t count,
				  void *buf, ssize_t *size,
				  ssize_t *bytes_copied)
{
	int buf_size_left = count - *bytes_copied;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;buf_size_left = buf_size_left - (buf_size_left % sizeof(u32));
	if (*size &amp;gt; buf_size_left)
		*size = buf_size_left;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the user passes a SIZE_MAX value to the &amp;#34;ssize_t count&amp;#34; parameter,
the ssize_t count parameter is assigned to &amp;#34;int buf_size_left&amp;#34;.
Then compare &amp;#34;*size&amp;#34; with &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; . Here, &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; is a
negative number, so &amp;#34;*size&amp;#34; is assigned &amp;#34;buf_size_left&amp;#34; and goes into
the third argument of the copy_to_user function, causing a heap overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a security vulnerability because iwl_dbgfs_monitor_data_read()
is a debugfs operation with 0400 privileges.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
