<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 03:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53396 — ubifs: Fix memory leak in do_rename</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53396</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubifs: Fix memory leak in do_rename&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If renaming a file in an encrypted directory, function
fscrypt_setup_filename allocates memory for a file name. This name is
never used, and before returning to the caller the memory for it is not
freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When running kmemleak on it we see that it is registered as a leak. The
report below is triggered by a simple program &amp;#39;rename&amp;#39; that renames a
file in an encrypted directory:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unreferenced object 0xffff888101502840 (size 32):
    comm &amp;#34;rename&amp;#34;, pid 9404, jiffies 4302582475 (age 435.735s)
    backtrace:
      __kmem_cache_alloc_node
      __kmalloc
      fscrypt_setup_filename
      do_rename
      ubifs_rename
      vfs_rename
      do_renameat2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this we can remove the call to fscrypt_setup_filename as it&amp;#39;s not
needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubifs: Fix memory leak in do_rename&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If renaming a file in an encrypted directory, function
fscrypt_setup_filename allocates memory for a file name. This name is
never used, and before returning to the caller the memory for it is not
freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When running kmemleak on it we see that it is registered as a leak. The
report below is triggered by a simple program &amp;#39;rename&amp;#39; that renames a
file in an encrypted directory:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unreferenced object 0xffff888101502840 (size 32):
    comm &amp;#34;rename&amp;#34;, pid 9404, jiffies 4302582475 (age 435.735s)
    backtrace:
      __kmem_cache_alloc_node
      __kmalloc
      fscrypt_setup_filename
      do_rename
      ubifs_rename
      vfs_rename
      do_renameat2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this we can remove the call to fscrypt_setup_filename as it&amp;#39;s not
needed.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
