<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 05:55:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-53271 — ubi: Fix unreferenced object reported by kmemleak in ubi_resize_volume()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53271</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubi: Fix unreferenced object reported by kmemleak in ubi_resize_volume()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a memory leaks problem reported by kmemleak:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unreferenced object 0xffff888102007a00 (size 128):
  comm &amp;#34;ubirsvol&amp;#34;, pid 32090, jiffies 4298464136 (age 2361.231s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ................
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
[&amp;lt;ffffffff8176cecd&amp;gt;] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x150
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa02a9a36&amp;gt;] ubi_eba_create_table+0x76/0x170 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa029764e&amp;gt;] ubi_resize_volume+0x1be/0xbc0 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa02a3321&amp;gt;] ubi_cdev_ioctl+0x701/0x1850 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffff81975d2d&amp;gt;] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x170
[&amp;lt;ffffffff83c142a5&amp;gt;] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[&amp;lt;ffffffff83e0006a&amp;gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is due to a mismatch between create and destroy interfaces, and
in detail that &amp;#34;new_eba_tbl&amp;#34; created by ubi_eba_create_table() but
destroyed by kfree(), while will causing &amp;#34;new_eba_tbl-&amp;gt;entries&amp;#34; not
freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by replacing kfree(new_eba_tbl) with
ubi_eba_destroy_table(new_eba_tbl)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ubi: Fix unreferenced object reported by kmemleak in ubi_resize_volume()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a memory leaks problem reported by kmemleak:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unreferenced object 0xffff888102007a00 (size 128):
  comm &amp;#34;ubirsvol&amp;#34;, pid 32090, jiffies 4298464136 (age 2361.231s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ................
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
[&amp;lt;ffffffff8176cecd&amp;gt;] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x150
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa02a9a36&amp;gt;] ubi_eba_create_table+0x76/0x170 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa029764e&amp;gt;] ubi_resize_volume+0x1be/0xbc0 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffffa02a3321&amp;gt;] ubi_cdev_ioctl+0x701/0x1850 [ubi]
[&amp;lt;ffffffff81975d2d&amp;gt;] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11d/0x170
[&amp;lt;ffffffff83c142a5&amp;gt;] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[&amp;lt;ffffffff83e0006a&amp;gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is due to a mismatch between create and destroy interfaces, and
in detail that &amp;#34;new_eba_tbl&amp;#34; created by ubi_eba_create_table() but
destroyed by kfree(), while will causing &amp;#34;new_eba_tbl-&amp;gt;entries&amp;#34; not
freed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it by replacing kfree(new_eba_tbl) with
ubi_eba_destroy_table(new_eba_tbl)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-53271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
