https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:39:52 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52804 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref</p> <p>Both db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the db_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.</p> <p>The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:</p> <p>UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20 index 7936 is out of range for type &#39;atomic_t[128]&#39;</p> <p>Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid indexes for the db_agfree array.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref</p> <p>Both db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the db_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.</p> <p>The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:</p> <p>UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20 index 7936 is out of range for type &#39;atomic_t[128]&#39;</p> <p>Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid indexes for the db_agfree array.</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52804