<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-43465 — net/mlx5e: RX, Fix XDP multi-buf frag counting for striding RQ</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43465</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/mlx5e: RX, Fix XDP multi-buf frag counting for striding RQ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XDP multi-buf programs can modify the layout of the XDP buffer when the
program calls bpf_xdp_pull_data() or bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(). The
referenced commit in the fixes tag corrected the assumption in the mlx5
driver that the XDP buffer layout doesn&amp;#39;t change during a program
execution. However, this fix introduced another issue: the dropped
fragments still need to be counted on the driver side to avoid page
fragment reference counting issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue was discovered by the drivers/net/xdp.py selftest,
more specifically the test_xdp_native_tx_mb:
- The mlx5 driver allocates a page_pool page and initializes it with
  a frag counter of 64 (pp_ref_count=64) and the internal frag counter
  to 0.
- The test sends one packet with no payload.
- On RX (mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_mpwrq_nonlinear()), mlx5 configures the XDP
  buffer with the packet data starting in the first fragment which is the
  page mentioned above.
- The XDP program runs and calls bpf_xdp_pull_data() which moves the
  header into the linear part of the XDP buffer. As the packet doesn&amp;#39;t
  contain more data, the program drops the tail fragment since it no
  longer contains any payload (pp_ref_count=63).
- mlx5 device skips counting this fragment. Internal frag counter
  remains 0.
- mlx5 releases all 64 fragments of the page but page pp_ref_count is
  63 =&amp;gt; negative reference counting error.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/mlx5e: RX, Fix XDP multi-buf frag counting for striding RQ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XDP multi-buf programs can modify the layout of the XDP buffer when the
program calls bpf_xdp_pull_data() or bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(). The
referenced commit in the fixes tag corrected the assumption in the mlx5
driver that the XDP buffer layout doesn&amp;#39;t change during a program
execution. However, this fix introduced another issue: the dropped
fragments still need to be counted on the driver side to avoid page
fragment reference counting issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue was discovered by the drivers/net/xdp.py selftest,
more specifically the test_xdp_native_tx_mb:
- The mlx5 driver allocates a page_pool page and initializes it with
  a frag counter of 64 (pp_ref_count=64) and the internal frag counter
  to 0.
- The test sends one packet with no payload.
- On RX (mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_mpwrq_nonlinear()), mlx5 configures the XDP
  buffer with the packet data starting in the first fragment which is the
  page mentioned above.
- The XDP program runs and calls bpf_xdp_pull_data() which moves the
  header into the linear part of the XDP buffer. As the packet doesn&amp;#39;t
  contain more data, the program drops the tail fragment since it no
  longer contains any payload (pp_ref_count=63).
- mlx5 device skips counting this fragment. Internal frag counter
  remains 0.
- mlx5 releases all 64 fragments of the page but page pp_ref_count is
  63 =&amp;gt; negative reference counting error.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-43465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
