<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-49272 — ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49272</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot caught a potential deadlock between the PCM
runtime-&amp;gt;buffer_mutex and the mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock.  It was brought by the
recent fix to cover the racy read/write and other ioctls, and in that
commit, I overlooked a (hopefully only) corner case that may take the
revert lock, namely, the OSS mmap.  The OSS mmap operation
exceptionally allows to re-configure the parameters inside the OSS
mmap syscall, where mm-&amp;gt;mmap_mutex is already held.  Meanwhile, the
copy_from/to_user calls at read/write operations also take the
mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock internally, hence it may lead to a AB/BA deadlock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar problem was already seen in the past and we fixed it with a
refcount (in commit b248371628aa).  The former fix covered only the
call paths with OSS read/write and OSS ioctls, while we need to cover
the concurrent access via both ALSA and OSS APIs now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch addresses the problem above by replacing the buffer_mutex
lock in the read/write operations with a refcount similar as we&amp;#39;ve
used for OSS.  The new field, runtime-&amp;gt;buffer_accessing, keeps the
number of concurrent read/write operations.  Unlike the former
buffer_mutex protection, this protects only around the
copy_from/to_user() calls; the other codes are basically protected by
the PCM stream lock.  The refcount can be a negative, meaning blocked
by the ioctls.  If a negative value is seen, the read/w…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: pcm: Fix potential AB/BA lock with buffer_mutex and mmap_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot caught a potential deadlock between the PCM
runtime-&amp;gt;buffer_mutex and the mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock.  It was brought by the
recent fix to cover the racy read/write and other ioctls, and in that
commit, I overlooked a (hopefully only) corner case that may take the
revert lock, namely, the OSS mmap.  The OSS mmap operation
exceptionally allows to re-configure the parameters inside the OSS
mmap syscall, where mm-&amp;gt;mmap_mutex is already held.  Meanwhile, the
copy_from/to_user calls at read/write operations also take the
mm-&amp;gt;mmap_lock internally, hence it may lead to a AB/BA deadlock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar problem was already seen in the past and we fixed it with a
refcount (in commit b248371628aa).  The former fix covered only the
call paths with OSS read/write and OSS ioctls, while we need to cover
the concurrent access via both ALSA and OSS APIs now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch addresses the problem above by replacing the buffer_mutex
lock in the read/write operations with a refcount similar as we&amp;#39;ve
used for OSS.  The new field, runtime-&amp;gt;buffer_accessing, keeps the
number of concurrent read/write operations.  Unlike the former
buffer_mutex protection, this protects only around the
copy_from/to_user() calls; the other codes are basically protected by
the PCM stream lock.  The refcount can be a negative, meaning blocked
by the ioctls.  If a negative value is seen, the read/w…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
