<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23300 — net: ipv6: fix panic when IPv4 route references loopback IPv6 nexthop</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23300</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: ipv6: fix panic when IPv4 route references loopback IPv6 nexthop&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a standalone IPv6 nexthop object is created with a loopback device
(e.g., &amp;#34;ip -6 nexthop add id 100 dev lo&amp;#34;), fib6_nh_init() misclassifies
it as a reject route. This is because nexthop objects have no destination
prefix (fc_dst=::), causing fib6_is_reject() to match any loopback
nexthop. The reject path skips fib_nh_common_init(), leaving
nhc_pcpu_rth_output unallocated. If an IPv4 route later references this
nexthop, __mkroute_output() dereferences NULL nhc_pcpu_rth_output and
panics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simplify the check in fib6_nh_init() to only match explicit reject
routes (RTF_REJECT) instead of using fib6_is_reject(). The loopback
promotion heuristic in fib6_is_reject() is handled separately by
ip6_route_info_create_nh(). After this change, the three cases behave
as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Explicit reject route (&amp;#34;ip -6 route add unreachable 2001:db8::/64&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is set, enters reject path, skips fib_nh_common_init().
   No behavior change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Implicit loopback reject route (&amp;#34;ip -6 route add 2001:db8::/32 dev lo&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is not set, takes normal path, fib_nh_common_init() is
   called. ip6_route_info_create_nh() still promotes it to reject
   afterward. nhc_pcpu_rth_output is allocated but unused, which is
   harmless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Standalone nexthop object (&amp;#34;ip -6 nexthop add id 100 dev lo&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is not set, takes normal path, fib_nh_co…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: ipv6: fix panic when IPv4 route references loopback IPv6 nexthop&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a standalone IPv6 nexthop object is created with a loopback device
(e.g., &amp;#34;ip -6 nexthop add id 100 dev lo&amp;#34;), fib6_nh_init() misclassifies
it as a reject route. This is because nexthop objects have no destination
prefix (fc_dst=::), causing fib6_is_reject() to match any loopback
nexthop. The reject path skips fib_nh_common_init(), leaving
nhc_pcpu_rth_output unallocated. If an IPv4 route later references this
nexthop, __mkroute_output() dereferences NULL nhc_pcpu_rth_output and
panics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simplify the check in fib6_nh_init() to only match explicit reject
routes (RTF_REJECT) instead of using fib6_is_reject(). The loopback
promotion heuristic in fib6_is_reject() is handled separately by
ip6_route_info_create_nh(). After this change, the three cases behave
as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Explicit reject route (&amp;#34;ip -6 route add unreachable 2001:db8::/64&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is set, enters reject path, skips fib_nh_common_init().
   No behavior change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Implicit loopback reject route (&amp;#34;ip -6 route add 2001:db8::/32 dev lo&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is not set, takes normal path, fib_nh_common_init() is
   called. ip6_route_info_create_nh() still promotes it to reject
   afterward. nhc_pcpu_rth_output is allocated but unused, which is
   harmless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Standalone nexthop object (&amp;#34;ip -6 nexthop add id 100 dev lo&amp;#34;):
   RTF_REJECT is not set, takes normal path, fib_nh_co…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
