<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 04:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-49783 — x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49783</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt
but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
   in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd
   preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
   RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
   Preemption disabled at:
   fpu_clone
   CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G            E       (unreleased)
   Call Trace:
    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
    dump_stack_lvl
    ? fpu_clone
    __might_resched
    rt_spin_lock
    fpu_clone
    ? copy_thread
    ? copy_process
    ? shmem_alloc_inode
    ? kmem_cache_alloc
    ? kernel_clone
    ? __do_sys_clone
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? exc_page_fault
    ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
    &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike says:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(),
  and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic()
  returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never
  been enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&amp;#39;s assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables
preemption so calling spin_lock_irq()…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt
but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
   in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd
   preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
   RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
   Preemption disabled at:
   fpu_clone
   CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G            E       (unreleased)
   Call Trace:
    &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
    dump_stack_lvl
    ? fpu_clone
    __might_resched
    rt_spin_lock
    fpu_clone
    ? copy_thread
    ? copy_process
    ? shmem_alloc_inode
    ? kmem_cache_alloc
    ? kernel_clone
    ? __do_sys_clone
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
    ? do_syscall_64
    ? exc_page_fault
    ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
    &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike says:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(),
  and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic()
  returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never
  been enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike&amp;#39;s assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables
preemption so calling spin_lock_irq()…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
