<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 21:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-98256</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-98256</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-98256</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98256</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98256</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;signal: Prevent exec() race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79
  ...
  Call Trace:
   __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
   do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160
   do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0
   __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270
  ...
  Allocated by task 80:
   do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030
   __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190
  ...
  Freed by task 12:
   kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0
   kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0
   kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0
  ...
  Last potentially related work creation:
   kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390
   __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320
   flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90
   begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo
explained:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the
struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid
now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that
thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s
task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while
release_task() flushes the queue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued
with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next.
list_del_init() i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;signal: Prevent exec() race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79
  ...
  Call Trace:
   __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
   do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160
   do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0
   __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270
  ...
  Allocated by task 80:
   do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030
   __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190
  ...
  Freed by task 12:
   kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0
   kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0
   kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0
  ...
  Last potentially related work creation:
   kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390
   __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320
   flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90
   begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo
explained:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the
struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid
now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that
thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s
task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while
release_task() flushes the queue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued
with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next.
list_del_init() i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98256</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jj25-6g4q-4cf8</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jj25-6g4q-4cf8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;signal: Prevent exec() race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79
  ...
  Call Trace:
   __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
   do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160
   do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0
   __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270
  ...
  Allocated by task 80:
   do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030
   __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190
  ...
  Freed by task 12:
   kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0
   kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0
   kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0
  ...
  Last potentially related work creation:
   kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390
   __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320
   flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90
   begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo
explained:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the
struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid
now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that
thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s
task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while
release_task() flushes the queue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued
with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next.
list_del_init() i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;signal: Prevent exec() race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79
  ...
  Call Trace:
   __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0
   do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160
   do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0
   __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270
  ...
  Allocated by task 80:
   do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030
   __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190
  ...
  Freed by task 12:
   kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0
   kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0
   kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0
  ...
  Last potentially related work creation:
   kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390
   __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320
   flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90
   begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo
explained:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the
struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid
now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that
thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s
task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while
release_task() flushes the queue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued
with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next.
list_del_init() i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-jj25-6g4q-4cf8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98256</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98256</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 121 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: signal: Prevent exec() race Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0   Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79   ...   Call Trace:    __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0    do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160    do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0    __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270   ...   Allocated by task 80:    do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030    __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190   ...   Freed by task 12:    kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0    kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0    kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0   ...   Last potentially related work creation:    kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390    __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320    flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90    begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0 It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo explained: de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds. If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while release_task() flushes the queue. posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next. list_del_init() is not a…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 121 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: signal: Prevent exec() race Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0   Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79   ...   Call Trace:    __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0    do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160    do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0    __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270   ...   Allocated by task 80:    do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030    __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190   ...   Freed by task 12:    kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0    kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0    kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0   ...   Last potentially related work creation:    kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390    __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320    flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90    begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0 It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo explained: de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader&amp;#39;s tid now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds. If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader&amp;#39;s task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while release_task() flushes the queue. posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next. list_del_init() is not a…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
