<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-98094</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-98094</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-98094</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-98094</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98094</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and
console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and
enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire
dirty_lock again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
  swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:
  (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}
  but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
  (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
  ----                    ----
  lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
                         local_irq_disable();
                         lock(console_owner);
                         lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(console_owner);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and
console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and
enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire
dirty_lock again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
  swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:
  (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}
  but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
  (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
  ----                    ----
  lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
                         local_irq_disable();
                         lock(console_owner);
                         lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(console_owner);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98094</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5wg8-22v7-6q2c</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-5wg8-22v7-6q2c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and
console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and
enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire
dirty_lock again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
  swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:
  (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}
  but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
  (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
  ----                    ----
  lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
                         local_irq_disable();
                         lock(console_owner);
                         lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(console_owner);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while
processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also
taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts
enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and
console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and
enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire
dirty_lock again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
  swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:
  (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}
  but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
  (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0                    CPU1
  ----                    ----
  lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
                         local_irq_disable();
                         lock(console_owner);
                         lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);
  &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;
    lock(console_owner);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for
fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the
IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-5wg8-22v7-6q2c</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98094</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98094</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts enabled. Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire dirty_lock again. The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:   WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected   swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:   (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}   but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:   (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}   CPU0                    CPU1   ----                    ----   lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);                          local_irq_disable();                          lock(console_owner);                          lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;     lock(console_owner);   *** DEADLOCK *** Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: fbtft: make dirty_lock IRQ-safe fbtft_mkdirty() can be reached from the fbcon rendering path while processing printk() in hardirq context. Meanwhile, dirty_lock is also taken by fbtft_deferred_io() in workqueue context with local interrupts enabled. Lockdep reports a possible IRQ lock inversion involving dirty_lock and console_owner. A hardirq can interrupt a CPU holding dirty_lock and enter the console rendering path, which can attempt to acquire dirty_lock again. The following lockdep report was observed on an RK3566 system with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled:   WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected   swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock:   (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}   but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:   (&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}   CPU0                    CPU1   ----                    ----   lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);                          local_irq_disable();                          lock(console_owner);                          lock(&amp;amp;par-&amp;gt;dirty_lock);   &amp;lt;Interrupt&amp;gt;     lock(console_owner);   *** DEADLOCK *** Use spin_lock_irqsave() for fbtft_mkdirty() and spin_lock_irq() for fbtft_deferred_io(). They only access the dirty line range, so the IRQ-off regions remain short.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98094</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3579 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
