<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T01:52:23.029981+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89557</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-89557 — md: do overflow check for sb-&gt;bblog_shift in super_1_load()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T01:52:23.032061+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>md: do overflow check for sb-&gt;bblog_shift in super_1_load()</p>
<p>In super_1_load(), sb-&gt;bblog_shift is an __u8 type value loaded from on-
disk superblock. It is used for badblocks API badblocks_set() by the
following sequence,</p>
<p>1930   rdev-&gt;badblocks.shift = sb-&gt;bblog_shift;
 1931   for (i = 0 ; i &lt; (sectors &lt;&lt; (9-3)) ; i++, bbp++) {
 1932           u64 bb = le64_to_cpu(*bbp);
 1933           int count = bb &amp; (0x3ff);
 1934           u64 sector = bb &gt;&gt; 10;
 1935           sector &lt;&lt;= sb-&gt;bblog_shift;
 1936           count &lt;&lt;= sb-&gt;bblog_shift;
 1937           if (bb + 1 == 0)
 1938                   break;
 1939           if (!badblocks_set(&amp;rdev-&gt;badblocks, sector, count, 1))
 1940                   return -EINVAL;
 1941   }</p>
<p>bb-&gt;bblog_shit is in range of 0-255, variable sector is 64bit width, for
an invalid bb-&gt;bblog_shit, it is possible to make sector be overflowed
by the following calculation,
 1935           sector &lt;&lt;= sb-&gt;bblog_shift;
Then in turn when call badblocks_set() at line 1939 with the invalid
rdev-&gt;badblocks.shift set at line 1930, may result an overflow inside
_badblocks_clear() in block/badblocks.c.</p>
<p>Although there are many places to call badblocks APIs, the non-zero
shift value is only used in super_1_load(), other places always use 0 as
the shift value. Therefore it is unnecessary to do a general shift value
overflow check inside badblock API, and just check here as the caller.</p>
<p>This may avoi…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89557"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
