<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T06:36:48.403925+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48950</id>
    <title>CVE-2022-48950 — perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T06:36:48.424579+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF</p>
<p>Per syzbot it is possible for perf_pending_task() to run after the
event is free()'d. There are two related but distinct cases:</p>
<p>- the task_work was already queued before destroying the event;
 - destroying the event itself queues the task_work.</p>
<p>The first cannot be solved using task_work_cancel() since
perf_release() itself might be called from a task_work (____fput),
which means the current-&gt;task_works list is already empty and
task_work_cancel() won't be able to find the perf_pending_task()
entry.</p>
<p>The simplest alternative is extending the perf_event lifetime to cover
the task_work.</p>
<p>The second is just silly, queueing a task_work while you know the
event is going away makes no sense and is easily avoided by
re-arranging how the event is marked STATE_DEAD and ensuring it goes
through STATE_OFF on the way down.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-48950"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
