<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T02:41:40.907691+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90313</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-90313 — bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T02:41:49.635191+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf, cgroup: Fix invalid storage access after __cgroup_bpf_attach failed</p>
<p>A potential invalid storage access issue can occur after replacing a
cgroup bpf prog.</p>
<p>This occurs in the following scenario:
1. prog1 with storage is attached to a cgroup in multi-attach mode.
2. prog1 is replaced with prog2 using BPF_F_REPLACE in multi-attach
   mode, but fails midway (e.g. in bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim or
   update_effective_progs).
3. A new prog3 is attached to the cgroup in multi-attach mode.</p>
<p>The reason is that __cgroup_bpf_attach overwrites pl-&gt;storage with the
new storage prior to attachment completion. When attachment fails
midway, the cleanup path calls bpf_cgroup_storages_free(new_storage) to
free the newly allocated storage, but fails to restore pl-&gt;storage back
to old_storage.</p>
<p>Consequently, the still-active prog1 holds invalid or dangling storage
pointers, leading to an invalid memory access when prog1 executes and
calls bpf_get_local_storage. Additionally, original pl-&gt;flags and
cgrp-&gt;bpf.flags[atype] are left unrestored.</p>
<p>Fix this by saving old_pl_flags, old_storage, and old_flags prior to the
update, and properly restoring all of them in the cleanup path on error.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90313"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
