<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:21.947204+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90138</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-90138</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:22.095285+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/bell-cve-2026-90138"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90138</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-90138</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:22.095424+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept()</p>
<p>Syzbot reported an issue which can be reproduced with these steps:
	r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
	bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT})
	connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; -1, EPROTO (self-connect)
	listen(r0, backlog)                   -&gt; 0
	r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
	connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; 0
	accept(r0)                            -&gt; -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err)</p>
<p>Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after
binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back
to r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it
to be incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The
unexpected packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO.</p>
<p>After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This
listen() call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never
inspects or clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a
normal client and connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this
incoming connection because the listener's sk_err still holds the
EPROTO error from the earlier failed self-connect.</p>
<p>This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to
never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport
implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket.</p>
<p>For a non-blocking connect(), vso…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-90138"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-r47p-87c6-4p5v</id>
    <title>GHSA-r47p-87c6-4p5v</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:22.095531+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept()</p>
<p>Syzbot reported an issue which can be reproduced with these steps:
	r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
	bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT})
	connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; -1, EPROTO (self-connect)
	listen(r0, backlog)                   -&gt; 0
	r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
	connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; 0
	accept(r0)                            -&gt; -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err)</p>
<p>Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after
binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back
to r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it
to be incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The
unexpected packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO.</p>
<p>After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This
listen() call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never
inspects or clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a
normal client and connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this
incoming connection because the listener's sk_err still holds the
EPROTO error from the earlier failed self-connect.</p>
<p>This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to
never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport
implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket.</p>
<p>For a non-blocking connect(), vso…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-r47p-87c6-4p5v"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11880-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:22.095598+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90138</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-90138</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T10:50:22.096221+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept() Syzbot reported an issue which can be reproduced with these steps: 	r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) 	bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT}) 	connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; -1, EPROTO (self-connect) 	listen(r0, backlog)                   -&gt; 0 	r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) 	connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -&gt; 0 	accept(r0)                            -&gt; -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err) Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO. After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen() call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the earlier failed self-connect. This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket. For a non-blocking connect(), vsock_con…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-90138"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
