<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T13:31:06.828582+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-46146</id>
    <title>CVE-2022-46146 — Prometheus Exporter Toolkit vulnerable to basic authentication bypass</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T13:31:06.897579+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> prometheus exporter-toolkit</p>
<p>Prometheus Exporter Toolkit is a utility package to build exporters. Prior to versions 0.7.2 and 0.8.2, if someone has access to a Prometheus web.yml file and users' bcrypted passwords, they can bypass security by poisoning the built-in authentication cache. Versions 0.7.2 and 0.8.2 contain a fix for the issue. There is no workaround, but attacker must have access to the hashed password to use this functionality.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-46146"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cgrx-mc8f-2prm</id>
    <title>GHSA-cgrx-mc8f-2prm — runc container escape and denial of service due to arbitrary write gadgets and procfs write redirects</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T13:31:06.897700+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/opencontainers/runc, Go: github.com/opencontainers/selinux</p>
<p>### Impact ###</p>
<p>This attack is primarily a more sophisticated version of CVE-2019-19921, which was a flaw which allowed an attacker to trick runc into writing the LSM process labels for a container process into a dummy `tmpfs` file and thus not apply the correct LSM labels to the container process. The mitigation runc applied for CVE-2019-19921 was fairly limited and effectively only caused runc to verify that when runc writes LSM labels that those labels are actual procfs files.</p>
<p>Rather than using a fake `tmpfs` file for `/proc/self/attr/&lt;label&gt;`, an attacker could instead (through various means) make `/proc/self/attr/&lt;label&gt;` reference a real `procfs` file, but one that would still be a no-op (such as `/proc/self/sched`). This would have the same effect but would clear the "is a procfs file" check. Runc is aware that this kind of attack would be possible (even going so far as to discuss this publicly as "future work" at conferences), and runc is working on a far more comprehensive mitigation of this attack, but this security issue was disclosed before runc could complete this work.</p>
<p>In all known versions of runc, an attacker can trick runc into misdirecting writes to `/proc` to other procfs files through the use of a racing container with shared mounts (runc has also verified this attack is possible to exploit using a standard Dockerfile with `docker buildx build` as that also permits triggering parallel execution of containers with custom shared mounts configured). This r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cgrx-mc8f-2prm"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
