<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T06:56:18.914465+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6</id>
    <title>GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6 — @hono/node-server has authorization bypass for protected static paths via encoded slashes in Serve Static Middleware</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T06:56:18.921059+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: @hono/node-server</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>When using @hono/node-server's static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting `/admin/*`), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.</p>
<p>In particular, paths containing encoded slashes (`%2F`) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>The routing layer and the node-server static handler normalize request paths differently. The router preserves `%2F` as a literal string when matching routes, while the static handler decodes `%2F` into `/` before resolving the filesystem path.</p>
<p>Example request:</p>
<p>- `/admin%2Fsecret.html`</p>
<p>This may:
- fail to match middleware intended for `/admin/*`, but
- still be resolved by the static handler as `/admin/secret.html` under the configured static root.</p>
<p>This does not allow access outside the configured static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>An unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization protections for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.</p>
<p>Applications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths under the same static root may have exposed those resources.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
