<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T05:39:49.249442+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-48990</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-48990 — joserfc: b64=false RFC7797 JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T05:39:49.266637+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> authlib joserfc</p>
<p>joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. In versions 1.3.4 through 1.6.5, joserfc accepts oversized RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads without applying JWSRegistry.max_payload_length, which can lead to resource exhaustion. The normal JWS compact and flattened JSON paths reject payloads above the configured payload-size limit with ExceededSizeError. The RFC7797 unencoded payload paths do not make the same check. A valid b64=false compact or flattened JSON JWS can therefore deserialize successfully with a payload larger than JWSRegistry.max_payload_length. Applications that accept lower-trust JWS values and rely on joserfc to reject oversized token content during verification have a moderate availability risk. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.7.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-48990"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wphv-vfrh-23q5</id>
    <title>GHSA-wphv-vfrh-23q5 — joserfc: b64=false RFC7797 JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T05:39:49.266757+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: joserfc</p>
<p># RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Testing revealed that `joserfc` accepts oversized RFC7797 `b64=false` JWS payloads without applying `JWSRegistry.max_payload_length`.</p>
<p>The normal JWS compact and flattened JSON paths reject payloads above the configured payload-size limit with `ExceededSizeError`. The RFC7797 unencoded payload paths do not make the same check. A valid `b64=false` compact or flattened JSON JWS can therefore deserialize successfully with a payload larger than `JWSRegistry.max_payload_length`.</p>
<p>This creates a moderate availability/resource-exhaustion risk for applications that accept lower-trust JWS values and rely on `joserfc` to reject oversized token content during verification.</p>
<p>## Affected Product</p>
<p>- Package: `joserfc`
- Ecosystem: `pip`
- Audited release: `1.6.5`
- Audit tag: `1.6.5`
- Audit commit: `881712980934fb601bed26fe3ae1ec0b7780e6f7`
- Tested affected releases: `1.3.4`, `1.3.5`, `1.4.2`, `1.6.2`, `1.6.3`, `1.6.4`, `1.6.5`
- Fixed release: none known</p>
<p>## Vulnerability Details</p>
<p>In `joserfc` 1.6.5, the default JWS registry has `max_payload_length = 128000` and exposes `validate_payload_size()`.</p>
<p>The normal compact extraction path calls that check before base64url-decoding the payload. The RFC7797 compact path validates the header and signature segment sizes, then assigns the unencoded payload directly:</p>
<p>```text
if is_rfc7797_enabled(protected):
    if not payload_segment and pa…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wphv-vfrh-23q5"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-2530</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2530 — joserfc: b64=false RFC7797 JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T05:39:49.266890+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: joserfc</p>
<p># RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Testing revealed that `joserfc` accepts oversized RFC7797 `b64=false` JWS payloads without applying `JWSRegistry.max_payload_length`.</p>
<p>The normal JWS compact and flattened JSON paths reject payloads above the configured payload-size limit with `ExceededSizeError`. The RFC7797 unencoded payload paths do not make the same check. A valid `b64=false` compact or flattened JSON JWS can therefore deserialize successfully with a payload larger than `JWSRegistry.max_payload_length`.</p>
<p>This creates a moderate availability/resource-exhaustion risk for applications that accept lower-trust JWS values and rely on `joserfc` to reject oversized token content during verification.</p>
<p>## Affected Product</p>
<p>- Package: `joserfc`
- Ecosystem: `pip`
- Audited release: `1.6.5`
- Audit tag: `1.6.5`
- Audit commit: `881712980934fb601bed26fe3ae1ec0b7780e6f7`
- Tested affected releases: `1.3.4`, `1.3.5`, `1.4.2`, `1.6.2`, `1.6.3`, `1.6.4`, `1.6.5`
- Fixed release: none known</p>
<p>## Vulnerability Details</p>
<p>In `joserfc` 1.6.5, the default JWS registry has `max_payload_length = 128000` and exposes `validate_payload_size()`.</p>
<p>The normal compact extraction path calls that check before base64url-decoding the payload. The RFC7797 compact path validates the header and signature segment sizes, then assigns the unencoded payload directly:</p>
<p>```text
if is_rfc7797_enabled(protected):
    if not payload_segment and pa…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-2530"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
