<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T12:07:12.096224+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90246</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-90246 — apparmor: fix integer overflow in verify_tags() bounds check</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T12:07:12.121371+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>apparmor: fix integer overflow in verify_tags() bounds check</p>
<p>verify_tags() validates the tagset table unpacked from a policy blob.
For each set it reads a count and checks that advancing the index by
that count stays inside sets.table[]:</p>
<p>u32 cnt = tags-&gt;sets.table[i];</p>
<p>if (i+cnt &gt;= tags-&gt;sets.size) {</p>
<p>i, cnt and sets.size are all u32, so i+cnt is evaluated modulo 2^32.
sets.table[] is filled by unpack_tagsets() with aa_unpack_u32(), so
every entry is a raw unbounded 32-bit word taken from the policy blob,
and verify_tags() is the function that is supposed to validate it.  A
count close to U32_MAX makes the sum wrap to a small value, the guard
passes, and the inner loop then walks sets.table[++i] past the end of
the kcalloc(size, sizeof(u32)) allocation.</p>
<p>Note that sets.size is bounded by 65535, because unpack_tagsets() reads
it with aa_unpack_array() as a u16, so the wrap cannot be reached by
growing the table; it is reached purely through the attacker-supplied
count.</p>
<p>With sets.size = 2 and sets.table = { 0, 0xffffffff }:</p>
<p>i = 0: cnt = 0, guard 0 + 0 &gt;= 2 is false, inner loop does not run
  i = 1: cnt = 0xffffffff, guard (1 + 0xffffffff) mod 2^32 == 0 &gt;= 2 is
         false, so the guard is bypassed and the inner loop reads
         sets.table[2] -- one element past a two element allocation</p>
<p>The walk continues until an out-of-bounds value happens to be &gt;=
hdrs.size or the access faults, so a crafted…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-90246"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
