<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T22:16:23.901955+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89518</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-89518 — sched_ext: Fix this_rq() assumptions in dispatch kfuncs</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T22:16:24.369929+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>sched_ext: Fix this_rq() assumptions in dispatch kfuncs</p>
<p>Under core scheduling, dispatch runs from within the core-wide pick and can
target a sibling rq, so ops.dispatch() may execute on a CPU different from
the dispatched rq's. Several kfunc paths assumed the two always coincide:</p>
<p>- scx_dsq_move() decided whether an rq lock is held by testing this_rq()'s
  rq flags and lock-danced accordingly. A dispatch for a sibling took the
  unlocked-context branch and acquired the source rq lock on top of the
  already held dispatched rq lock which could deadlock.</p>
<p>- scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() dispatched this_rq() with its stashed
  sub_dispatch_prev, which is NULL when dispatching for a sibling.</p>
<p>- finish_dispatch(), scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() and scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued()
  resolved SCX_DSQ_LOCAL to this CPU's local DSQ rather than the dispatched
  rq's. The latter two are callable from other rq-locked operations too,
  where SCX_DSQ_LOCAL now likewise resolves to the op's rq. This changes
  behavior also without core scheduling, e.g. for ops.enqueue() running a
  remote wakeup on the waking CPU, and is intended: which CPU happens to
  execute an operation is incidental, the op's rq is what it is operating
  on, and the resolution now matches the insert side where SCX_DSQ_LOCAL
  dispatches land on the task's rq.</p>
<p>Use the rq tracked by scx_locked_rq(), which is set to the dispatched rq
around ops invocations and NULL in unlocked…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89518"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
