<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T03:09:23.560004+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72466</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-72466 — xprtrdma: Fix bcall rep leak and unbounded peek</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T03:09:24.314460+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>xprtrdma: Fix bcall rep leak and unbounded peek</p>
<p>rpcrdma_is_bcall() decodes a reply's first words to decide whether
the frame is a backchannel call. Two issues in that decode path
let a short or malformed reply leak the receive buffer and drain
the Receive queue.</p>
<p>First, the speculative peek</p>
<p>p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 0);
    /* five p++ reads follow */</p>
<p>asks xdr_inline_decode() for zero bytes, which returns xdr-&gt;p
without consulting xdr-&gt;end. The five subsequent __be32 reads can
then walk up to 20 bytes past the wire payload into stale regbuf
contents and misclassify the reply as a backchannel call.</p>
<p>Second, after the post-peek</p>
<p>p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 3 * sizeof(*p));
    if (unlikely(!p))
            return true;</p>
<p>the short-header arm returns true without calling
rpcrdma_bc_receive_call(). The contract with the caller is that a
true return transfers ownership of rep to the backchannel path:</p>
<p>rpcrdma_reply_handler()
      if (rpcrdma_is_bcall(r_xprt, rep))
              return;        /* bare return, skips out_post */
      ...
    out_post:
      rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, credits + ...);</p>
<p>Because rpcrdma_bc_receive_call() never ran, no one took rep, but
rpcrdma_reply_handler still bare-returns past rpcrdma_rep_put()
and rpcrdma_post_recvs(). The rep, with its persistently
DMA-mapped receive buffer, is orphaned on rb_all_reps and freed
only at transport teardown. This completion reposts n…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72466"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
