<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T06:31:41.180009+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64309</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-64309 — crypto: ccp - Do not initialize SNP for ioctl(SNP_COMMIT)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T06:31:41.205895+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>crypto: ccp - Do not initialize SNP for ioctl(SNP_COMMIT)</p>
<p>Sashiko notes:</p>
<p>&gt; if SEV initialization fails and KVM is actively running normal VMs, could a
&gt; userspace process trigger this code path via /dev/sev ioctls (e.g.,
&gt; SEV_PDH_GEN) and zero out MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA globally? Would the next VMRUN
&gt; execution for an active VM trigger a general protection fault and crash the
&gt; host?</p>
<p>The SNP_COMMIT command does not require the firmware to be in any
particular state. Skip initializing it if it was previously uninitialized.</p>
<p>The SEV-SNP firmware specification doc 56860 does not mention SNP_COMMIT in
Table 5 as a command that is allowed in the UNINIT state, but it is in fact
allowed and a future documentation update will reflect that.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64309"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
