<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T21:35:58.199854+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64031</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-64031 — erofs: fix managed cache race for unaligned extents</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T21:35:58.204048+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>erofs: fix managed cache race for unaligned extents</p>
<p>After unaligned compressed extents were introduced, the following race
could occur:</p>
<p>[Thread 1]                                   [Thread 2]
(z_erofs_fill_bio_vec)
&lt;handle a Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_FOLIO folio&gt;
...
filemap_add_folio (1)
                                             (z_erofs_bind_cache)
                                             &lt;the same folio is found..&gt;
                                             ..
                                             ..
folio_attach_private (2)
                                             filemap_add_folio (3) again</p>
<p>Since (1) is executed but (2) hasn't been executed yet, it's possible
that another thread finds the same managed folio in z_erofs_bind_cache()
for a different pcluster and calls filemap_add_folio() again since
folio-&gt;private is still Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_FOLIO.</p>
<p>Fix this by explicitly clearing folio-&gt;private before making the folio
visible in the managed cache so that another pcluster can simply wait
on the locked managed folio as what we did for other shared cases [1].</p>
<p>This only impacts unaligned data compression (`-E48bit` with zstd,
for example).</p>
<p>[1] Commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of
 crafted images properly") was originally introduced to handle crafted
 overlapped extents, but it addresses unaligned extents as well.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64031"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
