<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T11:29:18.507700+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53358</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-53358 — Bluetooth: L2CAP: use chan timer to close channels in cleanup_listen()</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T11:29:18.510690+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>Bluetooth: L2CAP: use chan timer to close channels in cleanup_listen()</p>
<p>l2cap_chan_close() removes the channel from conn-&gt;chan_l, which
must be done under conn-&gt;lock.  cleanup_listen() runs under the
parent sk_lock, so acquiring conn-&gt;lock would invert the
established conn-&gt;lock -&gt; chan-&gt;lock -&gt; sk_lock order.</p>
<p>Instead of calling l2cap_chan_close() directly, schedule
l2cap_chan_timeout with delay 0 to close the channel
asynchronously.  The timeout handler already acquires conn-&gt;lock
and chan-&gt;lock in the correct order.</p>
<p>The timer is only armed when chan-&gt;conn is still set: if it is
already NULL, l2cap_conn_del() has already processed this channel
(l2cap_chan_del + l2cap_sock_teardown_cb + l2cap_sock_close_cb),
so there is nothing left to do.  If l2cap_conn_del() races in
after the timer is armed, __clear_chan_timer() inside
l2cap_chan_del() cancels it; if the timer has already fired, the
handler returns harmlessly because chan-&gt;conn was cleared.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53358"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
