<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T06:55:30.345909+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46130</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-46130 — dm-verity-fec: fix reading parity bytes split across blocks (take 3)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T06:55:30.349196+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>dm-verity-fec: fix reading parity bytes split across blocks (take 3)</p>
<p>fec_decode_bufs() assumes that the parity bytes of the first RS codeword
it decodes are never split across parity blocks.</p>
<p>This assumption is false.  Consider v-&gt;fec-&gt;block_size == 4096 &amp;&amp;
v-&gt;fec-&gt;roots == 17 &amp;&amp; fio-&gt;nbufs == 1, for example.  In that case, each
call to fec_decode_bufs() consumes v-&gt;fec-&gt;roots * (fio-&gt;nbufs &lt;&lt;
DM_VERITY_FEC_BUF_RS_BITS) = 272 parity bytes.</p>
<p>Considering that the parity data for each message block starts on a
block boundary, the byte alignment in the parity data will iterate
through 272*i mod 4096 until the 3 parity blocks have been consumed.  On
the 16th call (i=15), the alignment will be 4080 bytes into the first
block.  Only 16 bytes remain in that block, but 17 parity bytes will be
needed.  The code reads out-of-bounds from the parity block buffer.</p>
<p>Fortunately this doesn't normally happen, since it can occur only for
certain non-default values of fec_roots *and* when the maximum number of
buffers couldn't be allocated due to low memory.  For example with
block_size=4096 only the following cases are affected:</p>
<p>fec_roots=17: nbufs in [1, 3, 5, 15]
    fec_roots=19: nbufs in [1, 229]
    fec_roots=21: nbufs in [1, 3, 5, 13, 15, 39, 65, 195]
    fec_roots=23: nbufs in [1, 89]</p>
<p>Regardless, fix it by refactoring how the parity blocks are read.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46130"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
