<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T01:32:57.936265+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23207</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-23207 — spi: tegra210-quad: Protect curr_xfer check in IRQ handler</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T01:32:57.958097+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>spi: tegra210-quad: Protect curr_xfer check in IRQ handler</p>
<p>Now that all other accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock,
protect the curr_xfer NULL check in tegra_qspi_isr_thread() with the
spinlock. Without this protection, the following race can occur:</p>
<p>CPU0 (ISR thread)              CPU1 (timeout path)
  ----------------               -------------------
  if (!tqspi-&gt;curr_xfer)
    // sees non-NULL
                                 spin_lock()
                                 tqspi-&gt;curr_xfer = NULL
                                 spin_unlock()
  handle_*_xfer()
    spin_lock()
    t = tqspi-&gt;curr_xfer  // NULL!
    ... t-&gt;len ...        // NULL dereference!</p>
<p>With this patch, all curr_xfer accesses are now properly synchronized.</p>
<p>Although all accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock, in
tegra_qspi_isr_thread() it checks for NULL, releases the lock and
reacquires it later in handle_cpu_based_xfer()/handle_dma_based_xfer().
There is a potential for an update in between, which could cause a NULL
pointer dereference.</p>
<p>To handle this, add a NULL check inside the handlers after acquiring
the lock. This ensures that if the timeout path has already cleared
curr_xfer, the handler will safely return without dereferencing the
NULL pointer.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23207"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
